Terrible Sounds (2022)/ Wonderful Things (work in progress)
Terrible Sounds
Appearing on the centenary of the opening of the tomb of Tutankhamun, “Terrible Sounds” is a re-assessment of images and ideologies that surrounded that event. The first opening took place in the year 1922 when the British explorer Howard Carter uncovers the tomb. The second, in 1924 when an Egyptian elite pining for power re-opened the tomb after banning the British expedition. For these men, the discovery of the tomb of an ancient Pharaoh played a significant role in their competing ideologies of the national “liberation” of Egypt.
The African-American musician Sun Ra had a very different reading of the ancient Egyptians. For him the success of their reign delegitimized imperial narratives. He claimed the history of civilization started not with the Greeks or Romans but in Africa, in Egypt. Moved by Sun Ra’s vibrations and writings, the musician Hartmut Geerken moved to Cairo in 1967 where he joined local musicians in creating liberatory music. The third part of Terrible Sounds features Geerken’s final free improvisation recordings in 2021, joined by Nadah El Shazly, Maurice Louca, Ayman Asfour & Sharif Sehnaoui. Their music harkens to a time and space outside the organization of national music, outside of the logic of the nation-state.
A peasant uprising that preceded the tomb’s discovery by a number of years - and commonly excluded from the history books - is alluded to with drawings from satirist Yaqoub Sanu’s clandestine 19th C. magazine “Abou-Naddara Zarka.”
Wonderful Things
Wonderful Things is a film tapestry made up of Western cinema’s images of fascination of ancient Egypt. In the transition from colonialism to neo-colonialism, the obsession with the ancient world shifted from collecting and exhibiting artifacts to creating and exhibiting cinematic depictions of the inner world of fantasy around ancient Egypt. Terrible Sounds and Wonderful Things are in dissonant conversation with each other.
Terrible Sounds - A triptych
by Philip Rizk
❊
w/ Nadah El Shazly, Hartmut Geerken, Maurice Louca, Ayman Asfour, Sharif Sehnaoui
❊
How would I move to the sounds of colonialism?
For that matter, how would I move to the sounds of neo-colonialism?
But most important of all, how would I move to the sounds of neither?
❊
1
❊
On November 26 1922, the British archeologist Howard Carter opened up the tomb of boy-king Tutankhamun in the valley of the Kings of Egypt for the first time since its closing some 3000 years earlier. In it, he exclaimed to international media attention to have discovered “wonderful things,” so wonderful he said, they left him speechless.
The Metropolitan Museum of New York sent the photographer Harry Burton to document the excavations.
The discovery fed a fascination with the ancients and unleashed a movement called “Egyptomania” that revealed the occidental’s inflated fantasy life. Only weeks after the tomb’s discovery, German director Ernst Lubitsch celebrated the New York premiere of his film “Loves of a Pharaoh,” as if by premonition of the tidal wave exploding across the globe caused by the tomb’s opening. Some consider the rising tendency of fascism in Europe at the time, to have taken inspiration by the sudden explosion in cultural production around things Pharaonic, the grandeur, the glory, the power.
The following year the funder of the Tutankhamun excavation Lord Carnarvon was found dead. This incident spread rumors of “the mummy’s curse” and further stoked the flames of fantasy around the mysteries of the ancient Egyptians.
But the opening of the tomb also went beyond the realm of imagination and deeply impacted the political realities in contemporary Egypt. After disagreements with increasingly influential Egyptian elites over the ownership of the Tutankhamun tomb findings, Howard Carter seals the tomb and leaves the country. The Golden Age of unbridled taking of the things of the colonized - like the bust of Nefertiti brought quietly to Berlin - had come to an end.
❊
2
❊
A rural uprising in the summer of 1918 and spilling into the cities the following year forced the colonizing British to feign Egypt’s independence in February 1922, while maintaining political dominance over it. A key player in this spectacle was Fouad, the Sultan of Egypt. The act did not succeed at quieting Egyptian calls for an end to British rule. The Egyptian elite had used the global phenomenon of the unearthing of the Pharaonic boy-king to claim their legitimacy to nationhood. After having exiled Egyptian political hero Saad Zaghloul, again the British relented a little by allowing him to return in November of 1923.
With these first echoes of independence in Egypt, a national cinema is born, its first film Mohamed Bayoumi’s “The Return of Saad Zaghloul.”
On March 7 1924, Saad Zaghloul convened the “official” opening of the tomb of Tutankhamun and Bayoumi was on site to film the national event. The treasures of Tutankhamun’s tomb became a battle ground - not unlike Egypt itself - with the Egyptian elite claiming they belonged to the Egyptians.
Sultan Fouad uses this moment of national celebration of re-opening of the Pharaonic king’s tomb to crown himself the King of Egypt.
Ten years later, in 1932 that king of Egypt called for the Conference of Arab Music, in which the royal sought to reform the practice of music in the Arab world by emulating the civilized sounds of Europe. In parallel with a much wider state-making trend that looked to Europe, non-European elites sought to emulate the Occident in order to receive their own status as fully fledged nation-states. This meant the establishment of militaries and ministries, police forces and agricultural policies but it also meant that music, so central to the state-building process, needed to be re-thought. In the 1932 conference, the participants put the “music of the Orient” on trial, seeking to organize what they deemed to be in disorder, calling for European instruments to replace the ones in use in the Arab world, and creating a program to bring the free flowing music-making of the street under the roof of centralized state institutions where music would be written, taught and performed. The national elites believed that only organized music would allow a society like Egypt to join the tune of modernity. Systemization meant reason, the ordering of sound would bring about the order of the nation-state. Towards these ends a process of Colonization of the Ear was required.
On April 3 2021 the Egyptian military junta held the “Golden Parade” during which they transported 21 mummified queens and kings to their new home in the National Museum of Egyptian Civilization with a spectacle of unprecedented grandeur, featuring an mesmerising light show, dancers in pharaonic garb, the firing of military canons, and a composition written for the occasion performed by a live classical orchestra.
❊
3
❊
In the year 1827, awakened by a band of musicians in the streets of a Cairene neighborhood, the traveler Wolfhardine von Minutoli noted in her diary, “I ran to my window, fearing at first that some insurrection had broken out, and that they had come to besiege us in our European quarter; an event by no means surprising in the East, where people’s minds are so fickle, and fanaticism so easily excited. What was my surprise, at beholding a band of a dozen Arab musicians sitting before the door of the Okel, and straining, with all their might to execute this truly infernal music... It appears from this, that the Orientals entertain notions very different from ours on this subject. With them noise takes the place of harmony.”
These terrible sounds of independence were heard once again in the summer of 1918, when a movement of another kind had arisen.
That summer farmers across Egypt opposed the foreign occupier, opposing the forced conscription by the British as well as their incessant taxation of agricultural land. The farmers reacted by sabotaging train tracks, cutting phone lines and burning police stations. Many of these farmers also foresaw the threat of the local elite, a local pharaoh, taking the place of the foreign lords. These freedom fighters were not interested in the sounds of Europe, they wanted to move to a different tune.
Was the mummy’s curse a sound?
No images of the farmer’s revolt exist. Yet, in the year 1878 a Jewish Egyptian by the name of Yaqoub Sanu’ released the first issue of his satirical newspaper, Abou Naddara Al-zarqa, the man with the blue glasses. He was quick to point his finger at the colonial behavior of the local elite - these he caricatured wearing the Ottoman top hat - who were vying for power in Egypt while exploiting working people, the farmer, who appear in traditional Egyptian long robes in his drawings. The king of Egypt quickly exiled Sanu’ and banned the newspaper, yet the critic managed to keep inundating the country with his satirical criticisms for years to come. By the time a farmer uprising in the year 1918 targeted British colonial infrastructure, Sanu’ had died, but his writings and drawings had predicted these events for decades.
“In another world, harmony would sound incomprehensible,” Judith Jack Halberstam writes in the introduction to “The Undercommons”, a book one reviewer describes as “a powerful and necessary intervention that invites us to imagine and realise social life otherwise.”
In the turbulent year of 1967, a young German musician by the name of Hartmut Geerken, who had been moved by the sounds of Sun Ra as they were first being channeled across the Atlantic, took on a job in Cairo, Egypt. There destiny would bring him together with the drummer Salah Ragab, an Egyptian army General who was head of the military’s music department. Following nights of listening to records, and playing music, the two formed Egypt’s first jazz band, and soon thereafter the The Cairo Free Jazz Ensemble.
On February 17, 1971, the pair were joined by an eclectic group of musicians for a night of improvised music. That day, improvised sounds were once again heard in the streets of Cairo. “For 16 hours there was always someone playing,” Hartmut reminisces. The recording was released in the revolutionary year of 2011 under the title Muharram 1392. De-(neo)colonization of the Ear.
In 2021, 50 years after that gathering, and years after post-colonialism has comfortably settled into a neo-colonial state in Egypt, Nadah El Shazly, Maurice Louca, Ayman Asfour and Sharif Sehnaoui join Harmut Geerken - the only active musician remaining from that recording - for a tribute recording of that 1971 musical encounter.
How does one move to the sound of colonialism?
For that matter, how does one move to the sound of neo-colonialism?
But most important of all, how does one move to the sounds of neither?
❊
A Space to Drift Off
Philip Rizk and Nadah El Shazly in conversation with Maha ElNawabi
Maha ElNawabi: Tell us a bit about the origins of this project, where the idea came from – and in essence, what kind of story are you trying to tell?
Philip Rizk: Most of the projects I work on are process-based, which means that there is a lot of improvisation. There are often pieces of a puzzle that only come together by the very end. The beginning of this project goes back to a conversation about Mohamed El Bayoumi, who is probably Egypt’s first cinematographer and filmmaker. One of the most important things he did was a film documenting the second opening of the tomb of Tutankhamun. This is one of the historical narratives that underpin our project called “Terrible Sounds”. The tomb was most famously discovered and opened by a British explorer and this was documented by an American cinematographer. But when the Egyptians were granted a pseudo-independence from the British occupation, the Egyptians proceeded to close and then reopen the tomb as a kind of official opening. In my projects, there are often different layers and narratives that somehow come together. The musical aspect is a kind of accompaniment to this historical narrative. The overarching issue that I am addressing is the creation and fabrication of the nation state – this is where music is critical. In the case of Egypt, the pharaohs are an essential part of that narrative, but then music is also extremely important in creating a kind of national imaginary of what constitutes the culture of a place. So, this is where two seemingly unrelated issues come together in this project.
Maha ElNawabi: Could you tell us a bit about your collaborative process? When did “Muharram”, the collaboration between Salah Ragab and Hartmut Geerken, come into the mix?
Philip Rizk: The last film we worked on together, called “Mapping Lessons”, looks quite different: it is a feature length fictional travel film, but again it addresses this issue of the creation of the nation state. In that case it deals with Syria and the Levant before the lines were drawn between these states. One of the things that was happening in the making of that film is I was trying to figure out what sounds would accompany the images. For me, these are not disconnected things. I do not work on a film and then create a soundtrack after the fact, or assign someone the task of making a soundtrack to something I am working on. They very much need to be in conversation with me.
Nadah El Shazly: What was really interesting to me in “Mapping Lessons” was Philip’s use of archival footage, and how he was very open to using the sound of the footage or not at all – how he was looking to reinterpret some sounds from the archive. There is a narrative at the end of “Mapping Lessons” that reimagines itself, and it was very clear that he wanted to use Salah Ragab and Hartmut Geerken’s “Muharram 1392”, which became the core of the work I’m doing with Philip. With that came the idea for “Terrible Sounds”: that we wanted to reimagine “Muharram 1392” and how it would sound today – because of many musicians’ parallel interest in playing improvised music and the way that currently evokes references to improvised music from the 1920s to the 1970s.
Maha ElNawabi: How did you work with the original “Muharram 1392” album? Did you reinterpret the scores together or did you create new scores inspired by it – and how did Hartmut’s input come in?
Nadah El Shazly: Through Philip’s connection to Hartmut and by finding a way to communicate with him, it was very clear to us that we wanted to understand how they had recorded this album, and how it came to be. They had a very interesting set up: in Hartmut’s apartment, he had mics set up that were running all the time. He invited people to come and play music -– I cannot remember for exactly how long …
Philip Rizk: He said they played for 14 hours straight, of which he archived around 2,5 hours in recordings.
Nadah El Shazly: The idea was that we should understand from Hartmut as much as possible how this record was made, and the spirit of this album – to use it as something you could play with as an improviser or musician. But we were all recording in different cities, so we were reacting to each other. Maurice and I started playing together because we were both in Cairo. We recorded two full takes and sent these out to the other musicians who are involved, Sharif Sehnaoui and Ayman Asfour. They then recorded themselves playing to the music they were listening to, to “Muharram 1392”, and it all came together when I got all the files. From there, I could see how they could line up and work together.
We used the spirit of the album as reference. For instance, Maurice and I were improvising with each other, then Ayman Asfour and Sharif responded to those recordings. But it was also very clear that the inspiration could come from your own palette – it did not necessarily have to respond to anyone. For example, the way Hartmut recorded gave us the whole palette of instruments and percussion that he was using. He recorded around 45 minutes of him playing in response to his own work, and then we responded to him. This was a very open process, looking for that dynamic interaction with each other and giving us all space to drift off.
Philip Rizk: I think something else to mention is that Hartmut is the only living, active musician from that 1972 session of “Muharram”. I was with him the day he recorded his music for “Terrible Sounds”, and that morning he had listened to the entire original album. He acts as a kind of bridge between that historical session and this new recording that we have made. Finding this recording from 1972 was an important discovery for me. In a way, the state has tried to eradicate a certain type of improvisation in music – or let’s at least say that it is not the agenda of the state. There is a drive for music to be ordered and organised according to a European imaginary, and this is something that happened prior to 1932 but it was solidified in the Congress and the years following. So, for me, this 1972 session, whether intentional or not, was a counterpoint to this state project. What was highly unusual is Salah Ragab – who is often mentioned as a key figure in the history of Egyptian jazz – was himself a military general and was in charge of the military band at the time in Egypt. So, for Salah and Hartmut Geerken, to be working with this very central state institution in a way subverts and undermines the energy of that project – again whether intentional or not.
Maha ElNawabi: Some people argue that the 1932 Congress erased the future of Arabic music by standardising its tonal systems. Could talk about these temporal elements, and the idea of taking inspiration from a distant past rather than a recent past to reclaim these lost narratives?
Nadah El Shazly: Let me start by saying that my own personal interest in this time began the first time I listened to Abdel-Latif El-Banna and Mounira El Mahdeya. I thought it was actually music from the future. I could not believe it was from the past. The level at which they were playing together, without all these rules to constrain them, made their playing a lot more open. I think the power of improvisation and opening up the imagination of what you can do musically, and the extent you can change many things that are considered wrong in the Arab world, for example Mahraganat musicians who are getting attacked for not knowing music theory, is really important. You can free yourself from those ideas, at the same time evoking musicians that actually existed and were important and respected in Egyptian history. I think this situation really speaks to us as musicians or artists who reimagine other ways of doing things from how they are done today in that institutional prison.
Philip Rizk: I think that is absolutely beautiful. And it sums up why I wanted to work with you and with someone who thinks about music in that way. I think in Egypt, as in so many places, we find ourselves in a moment where we are told that there is no place for imagining that things might be different. For me, it is very important that we do that: just to stay alive, we need to imagine that things can be different from the way they are. In a lot of ways, we are in a very oppressive and dark moment: so to be able to look beyond what surrounds us, it is important to engage the imagination in a way like this. This is why music plays such a significant role in a project like “Terrible Sounds” – it is the unspoken narrative that guides this film.